Another example of that is the saying of Shaykh al-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (Majmu' al-Fatawa 8/380):
Ibn Taymiyyah refutes the saying that Hellfire will expire and perish in many different places and contexts. And one of those contexts is in relation to the erroneous views of Ahl al-Kalaam who denied an endless chain of events in both the past and the future (Jahmiyyah, Mu'tazilah). Hence, the matter of the eternity of Hellfire is often mentioned by Ibn Taymiyyah in relation to these individuals and factions. We commented a bit more on this issue in Part 1 so refer to our notes there.
The Jahmiyyah, Mu'tazilah, Kullaabiyyah, Ash'ariyyah, Maturidiyyah all deny that Allaah has actions tied to His will and power such that He speaks as and when He wills and acts (creates, provides, forgives etc.) as and when He wills. Because Allaah's speech and action is tied to His will and power, this clashed with the proof that these Ahl al-Kalaam borrowed from the Sabean star and idol-worshippers to establish the universe has a beginning, is originated and therefore has an originator. Some of them denied an endless chain of events in both the past and the future (Jahmiyyah and Mu'tazilah) and a consequence of this view is that they must claim that both Paradise and Hellfire will either perish (al-Jahm bin Safwaan), or all motion and movement will cease (Abu al-Hudhayl al-Allaaf from the Mu'tazilah).
As for the Ash'ariyyah and Maturidiyyah, then denied an endless chain of events in the past but affirmed it in the future, and this is a contradiction on their behalf, however to clarify and explain this issue and detail is outside the scope of this article and will be dealt with elsewhere inshaa'Allaah.
As for that necessitating that matters exercised through choice are established with His essence, then this is the saying of the Salaf, the Imaams of Hadeeth and Sunnah and many of Ahl al-Kalaam. 
